ABSTRACT
Aims: The COVID-19 pandemic presented new difficulties for integrated healthcare worldwide. Our study aims to highlight developing needs for cooperation while describing structures and practices of consultation liaison (CL) services established during pandemic across Europe. Method(s): The cross-sectional survey used an ONLINE self-developed 25-item questionnaire in four language versions (English, French, Italian, German). Dissemination was via national professional societies cooperating in EAPM, and heads of CL services from June to October 2021 Results: 259 hospital CL services took part in the study (28.0% response rate). 222 (85.7%) of these services reported providing COVID-19-related mental health care (COVIDpsyCare). Among them, 192 services (86.5%) reported the development of specialized COVID-psyCare co-operation arrangements. 135 services (50.8%) provided specific COVID-psyCare for patients, 85 (38.2%) for relatives, and 171 (77.0%) for staff, with 56.3%, 14.6%, and 23.7% of time resources invested for these groups, respectively. Interventions for hospital staff, commonly related to the liaison function of CL services, were rated as being the most helpful. Regarding newly emerging demands, 129 (58.1%) CL services stated a need for communication and support among themselves concerning COVID-psyCare, and 142 (64.0%) suggested certain adjustments or enhancements that they thought were crucial for the future. Conclusion(s): Specific structure to provide COVID mental health care for patients, their relatives, or staff were implemented in over 80% of the participating CL services. Resources were primarily allocated for patient care, and staff assistance was mostly achieved through the implementation of specialized interventions. COVID psyCare's development calls for further intra- and interinstitutional cooperation.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
We describe the adaptation of services to allow flexible and practical responses to the coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) public health crisis by four Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry (CLP) services; Galway University Hospital (GUH), Beaumont Hospital, University Hospital Waterford and St Vincent's University Hospital (SVUH) CLP services. This article also illustrates close collaboration with community adult mental health services and Emergency Department (ED) colleagues to implement effective community diversion pathways and develop safe, effective patient assessment pathways within the EDs. It highlights the high levels of activity within each of the CLP services, while also signposting that many of the rapidly implemented changes to our practice may herald improvements to mental health patient care delivery in the post-COVID-19 world, if our psychiatry services receive appropriate resources.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide threatening human health. To reduce transmission, a 'lockdown' was introduced in Ireland between March and May 2020. The aim of this study is to capture the experiences of consultant psychiatrists during lockdown and their perception of it's impact on mental health services. METHODS: A questionnaire designed by the Royal College of Psychiatrists was adapted and circulated to consultant members of the College of Psychiatrists of Ireland following the easing of restrictions. The questionnaire assessed the perceived impact on referral rates, mental health act provision, availability of information technology (IT), consultant well-being and availability of personal protective equipment (PPE). Thematic analysis was employed to analyse free-text sections. RESULTS: Response rate was 32% (n = 197/623). Consultants reported an initial decrease/significant decrease in referrals in the first month of lockdown (68%, n = 95/140) followed by an increase/significant increase in the second month for both new (83%, n = 100/137) and previously attending patients (65%, n = 88/136). Social isolation and reduced face-to-face mental health supports were among the main reasons identified. The needs of children and older adults were highlighted. Most consultants (76%, n = 98/129) felt their working day was affected and their well-being reduced (52%, n = 61/119). The majority felt IT equipment availability was inadequate (67%, n = 88/132). Main themes identified from free-text sections were service management, relationship between patients and healthcare service and effects on consultants' lives. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed increased pressure on service provision and consultant wellness. This further supports the longstanding need to increase mental health service investment.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To examine and compare rates and methods of self-harm presenting to a tertiary referral hospital during an 18-month period since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic with a similar period immediately prior to the pandemic onset. METHODS: Data from an anonymized database compared rates of self-harm presentations and methods employed between 1st March 2020 and 31st August 2021 to a similar time-frame prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: A 9.1% increase in presentations with self-harm was noted since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Periods of more stringent restrictions were associated with higher levels of self-harm (daily rate of 2.10 v 0.77). A higher lethality of attempt was demonstrated post-COVID-19 onset (χ2 = 15.38, p < 0.001). Fewer individuals presenting with self-harm were diagnosed with an adjustment disorder since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 84, 11.1%, v. n = 112, 16.2%, χ2 = 7.898, p = 0.005), with no other differences pertaining to psychiatric diagnosis noted. More patients actively engaged with mental health services (MHS) presented with self-harm (n = 239 (31.7%) v. n = 137, (19.8%), χ2 = 40.798, p ≤ 0.001) since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an initial reduction, an increase in rates of self-harm has occurred since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic with higher rates evident during periods of higher government mandated restrictions. An increase in active patients of MHS presenting with self-harm potentially relates to reduced availability of supports and particularly group activities. The recommencement of group therapeutic interventions for individuals attending MHS in particular is warranted.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Given the evidence that drinking patterns and self-harm hospital presentations have changed during COVID-19, this study aimed to examine any change in self-harm and suicide-related ideation presentations, together with any possible contribution made by alcohol or substance misuse, to Irish Emergency Departments in 2020, compared with 2018 and 2019. METHODS: A population-based cohort with self-harm and suicide-related ideation presenting to Irish hospitals derived from the National Clinical Programme for Self-Harm was analysed. Descriptive analyses were conducted based on sociodemographic variables and types of presentation for the period January to August 2020 and compared with the same period in 2018 and 2019. Binomial regression analyses were performed to investigate the independent effect of demographic characteristics and pre/during COVID-19 periods on the use of substances as contributory factors in the self-harm and suicide-related ideation presentations. RESULTS: 12,075 presentations due to self-harm and suicide-related ideation were recorded for the periods January-August 2018-2020 across nine emergency departments. The COVID-19 year was significantly associated with substances contributing to self-harm and suicide-related ideation ED presentations (OR = 1.183; 95% CI, 1.075-1.301, p < 0.001). No changes in the demographic characteristics were found for those with self-harm or suicide-related ideation across the years. Suicide-related ideation seemed to be increased after May 2020 compared with previous years. In terms of self-harm episodes with comorbid drug and alcohol overdose and poisoning, these were significantly increased in January-August 2020, compared with previous timepoints (χ2 = 42.424, df = 6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An increase in suicide-related ideation and substance-related self-harm presentations may indicate longer term effects of the pandemic and its relevant restrictions. Future studies might explore whether those presenting with ideation will develop a risk of suicide in post-pandemic periods.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 has had a profound effect on our mental health services. In a short period of time, mental health services have had to re-configure to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2. This has resulted in the closure of day services, reduced in-person psychiatric support and social isolation, leaving some of society's most vulnerable in crisis. The purpose of this study is to identify any differences in the number and severity of emergency presentations to the Emergency Department (ED). The study is a retrospective review of the log of patients referred to the liaison psychiatry team at an Inner-City Dublin hospital from the ED or inpatients wards where self-harm was the reason for admission. Three timeframes were chosen between January and June 2020: a baseline group (T1), lockdown (T2) and re-opening of society (T3). Severity of presentation was measured using the Threshold Assessment Grid1. (TAG) and DUNDRUM readmission scales2. from the anonymised database (n=306). Data were analysed using the application SPSS. There was a significant increase in self-harm presentations in T2 and T3 (T2 - 55.1% n=27 & T3 - 38.1% n=16) with the highest incidence during the first lockdown (T2). Psychiatric admissions rose during the pandemic, highest in T3 with an admission rate of 26.8% (n=11) compared to baseline (19.9%, n=39 T1, p value 0.733). The results demonstrate the impact of the first few months of the COVID- 19 pandemic on psychiatric services. Further research is required to fully understand the impact and the needs of this population. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
This commentary considers return to organized sport amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in the context of nonprofit community (grassroots) sport clubs that are the backbone of sport in many countries around the world. Local clubs can be vulnerable to challenging conditions at the best of times, and are at risk of significant negative impact if they cannot weather the storm of the current pandemic and resume their sport delivery. The opportunity and importance of drawing on evidence-based insights during these unprecedented times is highlighted here, by connecting examples of existing knowledge in several key areas (assessing and building capacity, embracing innovation, and adapting top-down policy directives to the local context) with the challenges facing community sport clubs. Potential directions for new research during and post-pandemic that builds on such foundational knowledge are also presented, charting a course for new inquiry that will support a more resilient community sport sector for the future.
ABSTRACT
Aims To determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of new patients attending a symptomatic breast unit and number of patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer. Methods Anonymised data of new attendances and breast cancer diagnoses between February and July 2020 were analysed and compared with data from 2019 and 2018. Results The average number of new patient attendances in February-July 2020 was 2,111 vs 3,008 during the same time period in 2018 and 2019 (30% less). The average number of breast cancers diagnosed in April/May 2020 was 36 vs 73 in April/May 2019 and 2018 (50% less). The number of breast cancers diagnosed in July 2020 was 60 vs 35 in July 2019 and 2018 (43% greater). Conclusion Less breast cancers diagnosed at the height of our nationwide COVID-19 lockdown and higher numbers diagnosed in July 2020 suggests a delay in presentation of these women to their GPs during lockdown.
ABSTRACT
This article describes the creation and deployment of a virtual tour guide to deliver content and enhance the visitor experience at the third-largest living history museum in the United States. Our work differs from other museum applications in AR and VR by: focusing on narrative storytelling from the point of view of an historical character embodied by a conversational digital avatar;employing place-based engagement within a historical context;and showcasing a historical figure who has an authentic connection to the museum environment he inhabits. Our goals with the project are three-fold. First, we provide an overarching narrative about life in western New York during the 19th century through the telling of five digitally-rendered characters whose stories are recounted in short-form vignettes shared with audiences. Second, we endeavor to develop “thinking dispositions” that encourage visitors to gauge and construct the significance of historical narratives that have the capacity to motivate reflection upon these stories on a personal, local, and global level. Third, we create a tripartite deployment that offers a common experience and supports a variety of delivery methods that respond directly to the health safety concerns raised by COVID-19. In sum, our project offers first-person accounts of the past mediated via XR, a blending of past and present to enhance the visitor experience. © 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
ABSTRACT
Background: A need arose to divert patients with psychiatric complaints from the emergency department to alternative settings for psychiatric consultations to reduce footfall during COVID-19. We assessed the effectiveness of alternative referral pathway in reducing COVID-19 infection in our service and its effect on service quality: response time and number of patients leaving before the review. We evaluated the satisfaction of patients, general practitioners (GPs) and mental health service staff with the pathway. Methods: All patients referred to the mental health service over a 2-month period following the introduction of the pathway were included. Findings were compared against the cohort referred for emergency assessment during the same period in 2019. Feedback surveys were distributed to patients, staff and GPs. χ2 and independent sample t-test were used to compare the variables. Results: Over 2 months, 255 patients received an emergency assessment via the pathway, representing a 22.3% decrease in the volume of presentations from the same period in 2019. There were no COVID-19 cases among our patients or staff on the roster for assessing patients. In comparison to 2019, response times were improved (p<0.001), and the numbers of patients who left the hospital before the review were reduced by 3.2% during the study period (p<0.001). Patients and GPs were highly satisfied with the referral pathway and believed that the pathway should be retained post-COVID-19. Mental health service staff were divided in their opinions about its sustainability. Conclusion: The pathway was successful in reducing the spread of infection, improving response times and reducing the numbers of patients who left without an assessment. Given the improved outcomes and acceptability, this is a preferable pathway for emergency referrals into the future. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
ABSTRACT
Recent estimates suggest that up to 34% of frontline workers in healthcare (FLWs) at the forefront of the COVID-19 pandemic response are reporting elevated symptoms of psychological distress due to resource constraints, ineffective treatments, and concerns about self-contamination. However, little systematic research has been carried out to assess the mental health needs of FLWs in Europe, or the extent of psychological suffering in FLWs within different European countries of varying outbreak severity. Accordingly, this project will employ a mixed-methods approach over three work packages to develop best-practice guidelines for alleviating psychological distress in FLWs during the different phases of the pandemic. Work package 1 will identify the point and long-term prevalence of psychological distress symptoms in a sample of Irish and Italian FLWs, and the predictors of these symptoms. Work package 2 will perform a qualitative needs assessment on a sample of Irish and Italian FLWs to identify sources of stress and resilience, barriers to psychological care, and optimal strategies for alleviating psychological distress in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. Work package 3 will synthesise the findings from the preceding work packages to draft best practice guidelines, which will be co-created by a multidisciplinary panel of experts using the Delphi method. The guidelines will provide clinicians with a framework for alleviating psychological distress in FLWs, with particular relevance to the COVID-19 pandemic, but may also have relevance for future pandemics and other public health emergencies.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on presentations to an acute hospital with self-harm. METHODS: All presentations to University Hospital Galway with self-harm were assessed during the peak period of the coronavirus crisis in Ireland, over the 3 months from 1 March to 31 May 2020. These data were compared with presentations in the same months in the 3 years preceding (2017-2019). Data were obtained from the anonymised service database. RESULTS: This study found that in 2020, the rate of presentation with self-harm dropped by 35% from March to April and rose by 104% from April to May, peaking from mid-May. When trends over a 4-year period were examined, there was a significantly higher lethality of attempt (p < 0.001), and significant differences in diagnosis (p = 0.031) in 2020 in comparison with the three previous years. The increased lethality of presentations remained significant after age and gender were controlled for (p = 0.036). There were also significant differences in the underlying psychiatric diagnoses (p = 0.018), notably with a significant increase in substance misuse disorders presenting during the 2020 study period. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 showed a reduction in self-harm presentations initially, followed by a sharp increase in May 2020. If a period of economic instability follows as predicted, it is likely that this will further impact the mental health of the population, along with rates of self-harm and suicidal behaviours. There is a need for research into the longer-term effect of COVID-19 and lockdown restrictions, especially with respect to self-harm.